Best Practice

Prioritising foundational knowledge and creating challenge in the science classroom

With research warning that the primary science curriculum can often be overloaded, Charlotte Jackson considers why this can undermine understanding and looks at prioritising foundational knowledge
Deep learning? A research study into primary science identified that children’s learning in science can sometimes be superficial and lack depth - Adobe Stock

Creating an ambitious primary science curriculum helps ensure children better understand the world around them and sets them up for their future studies at secondary school. But if it is too challenging, it can have the opposite effect. This is why foundational knowledge must be prioritised over extra content for science success.

In a report entitled, The 10 key issues with children’s learning in primary science in England (Bianchi et al, 2021), one of the 10 issues identified was that children’s learning in science can be superficial and lack depth. An observation made in relation to this was that sometimes there was an “overload of inappropriately selected science”.

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting Headteacher Update and reading some of our content for professionals in primary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcasts

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here